Larry Pinkney’s landmark 1981 United Nations ruling victory (self-authored) was cited in Building Human Rights Into Practice: A Training Manual on International Human Rights Law, The Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law, London, UK, February 2012, Chapter VI: Human Rights Standards and Security, Section 5: Evidence collection, surveillance, investigation techniques and the right to respect for private […]

The book entitled The Treatment of Combatants and Insurgents under the Law of Armed Conflict by Emily Crawford (Publisher: Oxford University Press, 2010, Print ISBN-13: 9780199578962) cited Larry Pinkney’s 1981 United Nations victory under the section titled Trial without Undue Delay in relation to “conduct of … the authorities.”

Excerpt (Page 145):

Trial without Undue Delay […]

A portion of Larry Pinkney’s United Nation submission under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights which brought to light the arbitrary handling of prisoner correspondence by prison authorities was highlighted in Chapter 4 of Part II: CONCEPTS AND NORMS, in the book entitled International Human Rights Law: Six Decades After the Udhr and […]

Larry Pinkney’s landmark United Nations ruling victory (self-authored case) was cited in the book ‘Due Process and International Terrorism’ by Roza Pati, published by Martinus Nijhoff Publishers (The Netherlands), 2009, Chapter II – Criminal Due Process Guarantees in Peacetime: The International Legal Regime, Section c. Due Process in Appeal, Pages 70-71:

[…]
For the […]

Larry Pinkney’s 1981 United Nations ruling victory was cited in the International Commission of Jurists’ Trial Observation Manual for Criminal Proceedings: Practitioners Guide No. 5, by Paul Richmond and Federico Andreu Guzmán, ISBN: 978-92-9037-141-2, Geneva, 2009, under “the right to be tried within a reasonable time.”

Excerpts from pages 128-129:

The elements and rights inherent in the right to a fair […]

Larry Pinkney’s 1981 United Nations ruling victory (self-authored case) was featured in the chapter titled “Equality before the law–the right to a fair trial” of the book entitled Textbook on International Human Rights (3rd Edition), by Rhonda K. M. Smith, published by Oxford University Press Inc. (New York), ©Rhona Smith 2007, ISBN 9780199289394.

Page 249 […]

One aspect of Larry Pinkney’s 1981 self-authored United Nations case victory was highlighted in the book entitled, ‘Essential Cases on Human Right for the Police: Reviews and Summaries of International Cases’ by Ralph Crawshaw and Leif Holmstöm (Book 4 of the series: The Raoul Wallenberg Institute Professional Guides to Human Rights), published by Martinus Nijhoff, 2006. […]

Larry Pinkney’s self-authored submission to the United Nations Human Rights Committee under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and its Optional Protocol, which resulted in his 1981 UN ruling victory, was cited 5 times in the book entitled The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and its (First) Optional Protocol, by Johann Bair, © […]

Larry Pinkney’s self-authored submission to the United Nations Human Rights Committee under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and its Optional Protocol, which resulted in his 1981 UN ruling victory, was cited in the chapter entitled Fair Trial of the book Leading Cases of the Human Rights Committee (First Edition), compiled by Raija Hanski and […]

Larry Pinkney’s 1981 United Nations ruling victory (self-authored case) was featured in the book entitled The Impact of the United Nations Human Rights Treaties on the Domestic Level, edited by Christof H. Heyns and Frans Viljoen (Professors of the Centre for Human Rights at the University of Pretoria), published by Kluwer Law International (The Netherlands), 2002, ISBN […]

Larry Pinkney’s 1981 United Nations ruling victory (self-authored) was referenced under the section titled “Excessive Delay” in the Harvard Human Rights Journal, Volume 5, Spring 1992, Page 76, Published by Harvard Law School (Cambridge, MA):

Excerpt from page 76:

The reservations entered by the United States do not reach rulings concerning the Covenant’s provision on delay. […]